| Arguments against Evolution |

Hello! Before we start this thesis against Darwinism and Evolution, I'm going to elaborate a little bit first:

When I was a bit younger, 8, 9, and maybe even 7 years old, I watched or read lots of pro-evolutionary (as now in this modern world most sources support it, and is almost considered a fact) videos, and for years I was pro-evolutionary. Just about a year or less ago because of my realization it wasn't inherently true, and it conflicted with Christianity, I became anti-evolutionary. 

Still, I remain quite unsure, undecided, and I feel I must finally, once and for all, disprove the theory. So here we are now. I'll list as much arguments as I know.

1. The Biblical Argument

Obviously, the Bible subtly attacks and warns us about this belief. But I'll refrain from using only the Bible to prove questions regarding whether some atheistic belief is true or no, so it is more believable, including for those who don't follow the Bible.

2. The Mathematical Argument

This is probably the most funny one. Imagine this: Wikipedia says 62% of the United States population agrees with evolution (probably less in Indonesia, but still), and think of this: the mathematical probabillity of a single cell coincidentally coming out and mutating is extremely unlikely: 1 out of 10 to the power of 60, or, get ready for it:

1/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Imagine that: if the universe would have gone in that many number of ways, only one of those universal scenarios would have evolution. Even then, if you compare that to the fraction of those who believe in evolution, that would be:

1/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 - 1/1.24. And the chances of evolution being true compared to the chances of people believing in evolution is so much smaller it is incomprihensible by the human mind.

3. Comparison Argument

Now compare evolution and the Bible. Though the Bible's creation story is certainly controversial, especially in the world of Christian Apologetics, but assuming there's a God, which is proven, there's no real glaring flaw. But evolution can be easily attacked, even Charles Darwin has noted some weaknesses of his own theory. 

4. The Origin Argument

This argument points out a glaring weakness in evolution's structure: it does not actually solve how life began. It only elaborated on how it changed. The major scientific theory in this area is called Abiogenesis.

5. The Consciousness and Emotion Argument

Consciousness and emotion may be attempted to be explained by atheists and darwinists, but think about it - can some puny chemicals that are merely formed from small and insignificant quarks, which form a near worthless atom, merge and become a fully fledged being which can be "happy", "sad", cry and laugh, in such incomprihensible and sometimes unpredictable ways, have rational thoughts  and logic, make languages and theories, communicate, group together, and even worship things that are not formed by these puny and near worthless atoms? It just doesn't feel logically stable.

That's all for now, but I might create a more stable thesis later on.